Beeherder, this is part of the reason for the study group: to analyze other people's ideas critically, with a mind to what will work, what won't, what is realistic to expect, what is not, etc.
Even when the authors are wrong, it will provoke lively discussions. Indeed, controversy provokes more discussion than agreement!
I haven't gotten all the way through the book yet, but I have a bad feeling it's got too much ideology based on the synopsis on the back cover about "restoring constitutional law" or something like that. SNOWFLAKE'S CHANCE IN HELL. But it's all worth a discussion.
Maybe if enough of us have the Ferfal book, we can do a discussion even without everybody having a copy.
I'll follow up later in the week with some planning, and some more invitations. I can't start quite yet, and it will take a while for folks to acquire copies of the book. Maybe start in November, with some adjustments for major holidays when posting could get sparse.